Reflection on Social Media Case 9: Ponderize
This case was very interesting to me, not only because I am
LDS, but also that the concept of “ponderizing” became so controversial so
quickly. The concept of “ponderize” was introduced by a general authority of
the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, urging members to find a scripture
that they love and ponder it as well as memorize it. The general authorities son made a page in which t-shirts were sold and there was also other pieces of
merchandise that were sold, promoting this spiritual concept. This ended up
causing a lot of people to start speculating about where the money was going.
This started the trending hashtag #moderndayprofits which turned into a frenzy
of questions about the intent of the general authority and his message.
He later apologized for the sites and they were all deleted,
but this case made me wonder how this might have affected active members and
what their thoughts might have been. I also wondered if there was any way that
this situation could have been resolved or avoided in the first place. To me it
goes back to the son of this general authority creating the outlet for people
to purchase these certain products. I think that it was a smart move in addressing where the money was going to be placed, and that it was not going into their
pockets but was being used to help support the church and their missionary
funds. I also thought that it was smart for them to delete all of the sites
that were linked to this situation so they could eliminate further issues.
However, I also believe that people are going to believe what they want about
the situation and that there wasn’t much that the church could really do to
remove the negative responses. They did their best to shut down any negativity
and re-frame it to be positive, which I thought was the best thing that they
could do.
Great post, Keslie! I think you make a really interesting point on how this would affect the minds of active members of the church. I think church officials handled it well by deleting any trace that the website existed. But your right, church members will believe what they want to believe. No matter what the church did in that scenario, many people might construe it to be what they want it be.
ReplyDeleteNice job!
ReplyDeleteGreat job with this once again! You hit all of the important elements of this case and I agree with you when you say that people only hear what they want to hear, they don't actually listen to the facts.
ReplyDeleteGreat job Keslie, you made a great point that things like this really affect the mind of active members. As members we look up to people who hold important roles in our church and when they do things that question their character it can question our beliefs.
ReplyDeleteGreat post! I agree in that I believe the best thing for them to do was to delete all sites associated with the products.
ReplyDelete